NHDR Core Message # 2

 


Pakistan
 
 

PAKISTAN NATIONAL HUMAN DEVELOPMENT REPORT 2003

POVERTY, GROWTH AND GOVERNANCE

 

ILLNESS SQUEEZING THE POOR AND AGGRAVATING POVERTY*
 

 
 

The NHDR/PIDE Survey 2001 shows that the poor are not only afflicted by a high frequency of illness but also, the high cost of medical treatment constitutes a major factor in pushing people into poverty.

The poor due to inadequate nutrition and hence lowered immunity are relatively more susceptible to disease. Moreover the lack of access over safe drinking water as well as unhygienic conditions of production, storage and consumption of food would be expected to result in a relatively high frequency of disease amongst the poor. It is not surprising that data show that 55% of the poor and 65% of the extremely poor in the NHDR/PIDE 2001 poor communities survey, were ill at the time of the survey. The high prevalence of poor health amongst the poor is also borne out by the National Health Survey of Pakistan. It shows that in rural areas, amongst low income women of 45 years age and above as many as about 45% suffer from poor health and over 80% suffer from poor to fair health. Amongst men in rural areas, almost 60% suffer from poor to fair health. Similarly children under 5 years of age in rural Pakistan have on average 6 episodes of cough and fever during the year.

The NHDR/PIDE Survey 2001 shows that not only 65.1% of the extremely poor respondents were sick at the time of the survey but that they had on average suffered from their current sickness for the last 95 days. The NHDR/PIDE Survey shows that rather than going to homeopaths, hakims or even government hospitals and dispensaries, the poor predominantly go to private allopathic medical practitioners. This is reflective of the desire of the poor to get the best possible medical treatment for their loved ones. It is also reflective of the poor quality of most government medical facilities and of the lack of access of the poor over the better ones. Of the poor in the various income classes, on average, 54% go to private medical practitioners, 13.3% to government hospitals, 8.0% to government dispensaries and only 5.6% to homeopaths, hakims and others.

Ironically, a large number of private allopathic medical practitioners who are conducting private practices in the rural areas, are poorly trained and have grossly inadequate diagnostic facilities. The result is that when the poor fall ill they suffer for a protracted period and get locked into a high cost source of medical treatment. Further, the extremely poor spend Rs.1,885/- on their current illness and 49.4% of thepatients have to travel over 6 kilometers for their medical consultation. But given the high cost of medical treatment and protracted illness due to inadequate diagnostic facilities, in many cases the poor are forced to sell whatever few assets they have and to finally borrow money to finance the treatment of their loved ones. The poignancy of the human condition of the poor in this context is that as they undertake the noble act of providing succour to their family members, they get pushed deeper into poverty.



* NHDR 2003, Page 69-70



 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Data shows that not only 65.1% of the extremely poor respondents were sick at the time of the survey but that they had on average suffered from their current sickness for the last 95 days