|
In terms of comparative picture of NGOs, 68% of NRSP respondents ate
their fill daily and 65% ate better than earlier. In the case of OPP,
72% of the beneficiaries ate their fill daily while 27% ate more than
earlier

SOURCE: NHDR/A.I. HAMID SPOT SURVEY 2001.

SOURCE: NHDR/A.I. HAMID SPOT SURVEY 2001.
* NHDR 2003, Page
92-95
A substantial proportion of respondents related
with each NGO there has been a deterioration in health status. This is
consistent with the NHDR /PIDE data set both quantitative and
qualitative which shows wide spread illness amongst the poor with
sickness being an important factor in pushing people into poverty. As
many as 60 per cent of the respondents in KK reported a deterioration
in their health, 39 per cent in the case of OPP, 41.7 per cent in the
case of PIEDAR, 40.5 per cent in the case of KASHIF, 42.1 per cent in
the case of OWP and 40.6 per cent in the case of ASB. However, NRSP
stands out with only 12.5% of its beneficiaries reporting a
deterioration in their health and as many as 50 per cent reporting an
improvement in their health. NRSP respondents pointed to greater
agricultural productivity, higher yields, better supply of inputs and
adoption of new techniques as the factors which had improved their
income, consumption and health.

SOURCE: NHDR/A.I. HAMID SPOT SURVEY 2001.
For all the NGOs sampled, except for KK more
than 50 per cent of the beneficiaries achieved a sustainable increase
in income following the receipt of a loan. The top performer is NRSP
with 81.6 per cent of its beneficiaries experiencing a sustainable
increase in their income after receipt of a loan.

SOURCE: NHDR/A.I. HAMID SPOT SURVEY 2001.
|